logo logo International Journal of Educational Methodology

IJEM is a leading, peer-reviewed, open access, research journal that provides an online forum for studies in education, by and for scholars and practitioners, worldwide.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

RHAPSODE
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
RHAPSODE
Headquarters
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
Research Article

Faculty Usage Patterns of Learning Management Systems in Distance Education

Jianfeng Wang , Xiaodong Deng , Daniel Wang

There are studies in the learning management literature examining the measure of system usage, but few explore how users apply the software tools to a.


  • Pub. date: May 15, 2025
  • Online Pub. date: May 12, 2025
  • Pages: 217-231
  • 41 Downloads
  • 211 Views
  • 0 Citations

How to Cite

Abstract:

T

There are studies in the learning management literature examining the measure of system usage, but few explore how users apply the software tools to achieve specific work tasks, which in turn leads to perceived benefits. In the context of distance education, this study focuses on how Learning Management Systems (LMS) are fully used by faculty for their instructional needs. It extends existing research on LMS adoption by investigating how faculty members or instructors use the LMS tools for effective class teaching to achieve educational outcomes. Four usage patterns were identified: communication, content management, assessment, and class management. A model is presented to examine how these usage patterns interplay to achieve the perceived benefits. Data were collected from 544 instructors using LMS, such as Blackboard Learn, etc. Structural equation modeling using LISREL was employed to assess the research model. The results suggest that the usage for communication, content, and assessment activities positively impacts the usage for class management. In turn, the usage for class management influences the net benefits perceived by the instructors, and the usage for content also impacts perceived net benefits directly. These results provide practical guidelines for LMS developers’ design improvements and institutions’ policies, such as training instructors to fully utilize LMS features to achieve the maximum benefits of distance education.

Keywords: Class management, distance education, faculty perspective, learning management systems, perceived benefits.

description PDF
file_save XML
Article Metrics
Views
41
Download
211
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004  

Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Why do students adopt and use learning management systems?: Insights from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), Article 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100088

Alotaibi, R. S., & Alshahrani, S. M. (2022). An extended DeLone and McLean’s model to determine the success factors of e-learning platform. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, Article e876. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.876  

Alterkait, M. A., & Alduaij, M. Y. (2024). Impact of information quality on satisfaction with e-learning platforms: Moderating role of instructor and learner quality. Sage Open, 14(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241233400

Altinpulluk, H., & Kesim, M. (2021). A systematic review of the tendencies in the use of learning management systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961812

Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2021). Application of learning management system (LMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A sustainable acceptance model of the expansion technology approach. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910991

Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2019). Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617726123

Amiri, M., Montazer, G. A., & Mousavi, E. (2024). Educational customization by homogenous grouping of e-learners based on their learning styles. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.12619

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900407

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Balkaya, S., & Akkucuk, U. (2021). Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031127

Beebe, R., Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2010). Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from face-to-face to online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(1), 1-12. https://bit.ly/4jMbEec

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Blackboard. (n.d.). Feature guide for the Blackboard app. Retrieved March 21, 2025, from https://bit.ly/4cOLHs3

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179

Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36

Bulut, O., Gorgun, G., Yildirim-Erbasli, S. N., Wongvorachan, T., Daniels, L. M., Gao, Y., Lai, K. W., & Shin, J. (2023). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Online formative assessments as the foundation for predictive learning analytics models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13276

Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). The acceptance of learning management systems and video conferencing technologies: Lessons learned from Covid-19. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 27, 1311-1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09561-y

Chang, F. C.-I. (2003). Quantitative analysis of distance learning courseware. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 20, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023470400109

Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309-334. https://doi.org/dsxksd

Chen, F., & Cui, Y. (2020). Utilizing student time series behaviour in learning management systems for early prediction of course performance. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.72.1

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin.com, 3, Article 7. https://bit.ly/4iCdiyL  

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Desplaces, D., Blair, C. A., & Salvaggio, T. (2015). Do e-learning tools make a difference? Results from a case study. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 23-24.

Doll, W. J., Raghunathan, T. S., Lim, J.-S., & Gupta, Y. P. (1995). A confirmatory factor analysis of the user satisfaction instrument. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.177

Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/248851

Edward, C. N., Asirvatham, D., & Johar, M. G. M. (2018). Effect of blended learning and learners' characteristics on students' competence: An empirical evidence in learning oriental music. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2587-2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9732-4

Eisenman, G., Edwards, S., & Cushman, C. A. (2015). Bring reality to classroom management in teacher education. The Professional Educator, 39(1), 1-12.

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930220138606

Feng, Q., Li, W., Zhu, X., & Li, X. (2025). Exploring the effects of elaborated and motivational feedback on learning engagement in online scripted role discussion. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00499-6

Firat, M. (2023). Integrating AI applications into learning management systems to enhance e-learning. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1244453

Gamede, B. T., Ajani, O. A., & Afolabi, O. S. (2022). Exploring the adoption and usage of learning management system as alternative for curriculum delivery in South African higher education institutions during Covid-19 lockdown. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p71

Garrels, V., & Zemliansky, P. (2022). Improving student engagement in online courses through interactive and user-centered course design: Practical strategies. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(2), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.2.3

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761

Goldsmith, D. J. (2007). Enhancing learning and assessment through e-portfolios: A collaborative effort in Connecticut. New Directions for Student Services, 2007(119), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.247

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.  

Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1990). Confirmatory modeling in organizational behavior/human resource management: Issues and applications. Journal of Management, 16(2), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600206

Herrera-Pavo, M. Á. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learning, culture and social interaction, 28, Article 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100437

Huang, M.-C., Chang, I.-C., & Hwang, H.-G. (2011). Exploring academic teachers' continuance toward the web-based learning system: The role of causal attributions. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1530-1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.001

Islam, A. K. M. N. (2015). The moderation effect of user-type (educators vs. students) in learning management system continuance. Behaviour and Information Technology, 34(12), 1160-1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1004651

Ismail, S. N., Hamid, S., Ahmad, M., Alaboudi, A., & Jhanjhi, N. (2021). Exploring students engagement towards the learning management system (LMS) using learning analytics. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 37(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2021.015261

Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291393  

Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL VIII user’s reference guide. Scientific Software, Inc.  

Kelly, D., Baxter, J. S., & Anderson, A. (2010). Engaging first-year students through online collaborative assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00361.x

Kittur, J., Bekki, J., & Brunhaver, S. (2021). Development of a student engagement score for online undergraduate engineering courses using learning management system interaction data. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(3), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22479

Kmenta, J. (1971). Elements of econometrics. MacMillan.  

Koh, J. H. L., & Kan, R. Y. P. (2020). Perceptions of learning management system quality, satisfaction, and usage: Differences among students of the arts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5187

Korsah, D. P. (2024). Adoption and utilization of Moodle learning management system for emergency remote teaching: A UTAUT perspective. Educational Point, 1(2), Article e111. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/15730

Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P. P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

Lee, J.-E., & Recker, M. (2021). The effects of instructors' use of online discussions strategies on student participation and performance in university online introductory mathematics courses. Computers and Education, 162, Article 104084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104084

Limbu, Y. B., & Pham, L. (2023). Impact of e-learning service quality on student satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 15(4), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.030

Littlefield, M. B., & Roberson, K. C. (2005). Computer technology for the feminist classroom. Affilia, 20(2), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109905274676

Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Dunlap, J. C. (2017). Live synchronous web meetings in asynchronous online courses: Reconceptualizing virtual office hours. Online Learning, 21(4), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1285

Maki, R. H., & Maki, W. S. (2007). Online courses. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. J. Perfect (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 527-552). Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713181.ch20

Mandalapu, V., Chen, L. K., Shetty, S., Chen, Z., & Gong, J. (2022). Student-centric model of learning management system activity and academic performance: From correlation to causation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.15430

Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. (1993). How do teachers learn to manage classroom behavior? A study of teachers' opinions about their initial training with special reference to classroom behavior management. Educational Studies, 19(3), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569930190106

Moodle. (2024). Features. Retrieved March 21, 2025 from https://docs.moodle.org/405/en/Features

Mustafa, A. (2021). The personalization of e-learning systems with the contrast of strategic knowledge and learner's learning preferences: An investigatory analysis. Applied Computing and Informatics, 17(1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.001

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Table 311.15. Number and percentage of students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by distance education participation, location of student, level of enrollment, and control and level of institution: Fall 2017 and fall 2018. https://bit.ly/4iiSgoM

National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Table 311.15. Number and percentage of students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by distance education participation, location of student, level of enrollment, and control and level of institution: Fall 2021 and fall 2022. https://bit.ly/3DOfGn4

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.  

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E., & Bagnara, S. (1999). Multimedia systems in distance education: Effects of usability on learning. Interacting with Computers, 12(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00054-X

Quinney, A. (2005). ‘Placements online’: Student experiences of a website to support learning in practice settings. Social Work Education, 24(4), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500096951

Reid, L. (2019). Learning management systems: The game changer for traditional teaching and learning at adult and higher education institutions. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(6), 1-14. https://bit.ly/42T5odV

Rhode, J., Richter, S., Gowen, P., Miller, T., & Wills, C. (2017). Understanding faculty use of the learning management system. Online Learning, 21(3), 68-86. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1217

Romero, L., North, M., Gutierrez, M., & Caliusco, L. (2015). Pedagogically-driven ontology network for conceptualizing the e-learning assessment domain. Educational Technology and Society, 18(4), 312-330. https://bit.ly/41Z7aJR

Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2022). Learning management systems in education: Research and challenges. In Digital Active Methodologies for Educative Learning Management (pp. 47-77). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4706-2.ch003  

Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471

Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002). Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: Some food for thought. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00081

Sanga, M. W. (2016). An analysis of technological issues emanating from faculty transition to a new learning management system. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 11-21.  

Sethi, V., & King, W. R. (1994). Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science, 40(12), 1601-1627. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1601  

Sharda, R., Romano, N. C., Jr., Lucca, J., Weiser, M., Scheets, G., Chung, J.-M., & Sleezer, C. M. (2004). Foundation for the Study of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Requiring Immersive Presence, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 31-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045780

Shayan, P., Rondinelli, R., van Zaanen, M., & Atzmueller, M. (2023). Multi-level analysis of learning management systems’ user acceptance exemplified in two system case studies. Data, 8(3), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8030045

Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865

Steiger, J. H. (1989). Ez-Path: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. SYSTAT.

Sulaiman, T. T. (2024). A systematic review on factors influencing learning management system usage in Arab gulf countries. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2503-2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11936-w

Topal, A. D. (2016). Examination of university students' level of satisfaction and readiness for e-courses and the relationship between them. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.15.7

Urbach, N., & Müller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A review and empirical test. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory (pp. 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_1

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111(2872), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.111.2872.23

Vonderwell, S. K., & Boboc, M. (2013). Promoting formative assessment in online teaching and learning. TechTrends, 57, 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x

Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1997). Coping with technology @work @home @play. Wiley.  

Widyaningrum, T., Sholihah, Q., & Haryono, B. S. (2024). The DeLone and McLean information system success model: Investigating user satisfaction in learning management system. Journal of Education Technology, 8(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.71080

Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2020). 'Check the grade, log out': Students' engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331

Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431

Yuliansyah, A., & Ayu, M. (2021). The implementation of project-based assignment in online learning during covid-19. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i1.851

...