University Faculty Research Competence: A Systematic Literature Review of Core Components, Distinctions, and Measures
Recent studies identified that faculty research productivity increased when they felt competent in conducting research. Faculty level of research comp.
Abstract:
Recent studies identified that faculty research productivity increased when they felt competent in conducting research. Faculty level of research competency varies due to academic training, context, country, discipline, and experiences; however, what is faculty research competency? The core competencies of faculty research are unclear; thus, the current study systematically reviewed the literature. Researchers used Boolean searches of four popular databases to identify 553 articles for first-level screening. These yielded 46 peer-reviewed journal articles for full-text analysis, six of which focused on faculty populations (40 on non-faculty). Six core components of faculty research proficiency were identified: finding and reviewing literature, planning a study, collecting and analyzing data, writing research, disseminating research findings, and managing research projects. Compared to non-faculty populations, faculty are uniquely more engaged in research project management. Researchers also identified 18 sub-competencies that will help to measure faculty research competency more reliably in the future. Finally, as the identified studies relied on self-reported measurements that may carry self-representation bias, an aspirational implication is to develop a competency-based diagnostic test for measuring faculty research competence.
Keywords: Faculty, higher education, measures, research competence, systematic review.
0
References
Note: References marked with an * were included in the systematic review.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics, 81, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2131-7
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Soldatenkova, A. (2017). How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: Evidence from Italy. Scientometrics, 110, 867-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x
Albarra’n, P., Crespo, J. A., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics, 88, 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9
Armijos Valdivieso, P., Avolio Alecchi, B., & Arévalo-Avecillas, D. (2022). Factors that influence the individual research output of university professors: The case of Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 21(4), 450-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211008684
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/46915
*Behar-Horenstein, L. S., Beck, D. E., & Su, Y. (2018). Perceptions of pharmacy faculty need for development in educational research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.09.019
Bond, D., Clout, V. J., Czernkowski, R. M. J., & Wright, A. (2021). Research productivity of Australian accounting academics. Accounting and Finance, 61(1), 1081-1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12604
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carrasco, R., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014). The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economists. Economic Inquiry, 52(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12028
Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: lessons from the sciences and the social sciences (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED267677
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed). Pearson.
*Farsani, M. A., Babaii, E., Beikmohammadi, M., & Farsani, M. B. (2022). Mixed-methods research proficiency for applied linguists: A PLS-path modelling approach. Quality and Quantity, 56, 3337-3362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01268-7
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 28-45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(1), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072703257719
*Griffioen, D. M. E., De Jong, U., & Jak, S. (2013). Research self-efficacy of lecturers in non-university higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746512
Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. In Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing. WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35-69. https://bit.ly/3WUxjI7
Hardré, P. L., Miller, R. L., Beesley, A. D., Pace, T. M., Maxwell, M. S., & Xie, K. (2007). What motivates faculty to do research? Tenure-track faculty in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(1), 75-99.
Jaffe, K., ter Horst, E., Gunn, L. H., Zambrano, J. D., & Molina, G. (2020). A network analysis of research productivity by country, discipline, and wealth. PLoS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232458
Kaycheng, S. (2015). Multicolinearity and indicator redundancy problem in world university rankings: an example using times higher education world university ranking 2013–2014 data. Higher Education Quarterly, 69(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12058
*Koshmaganbetova, G. K., Kurmangaliyeva, S. S., Kashkinbayeva, A. R., Kurmangaliyev, K. B., & Alekenova, N. U. (2020). Research competencies of medical university teachers: Evaluation, perception, and perspective. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(E), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.3954
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality and quantity, 47, 2025-2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Kwiek, M. (2018). High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? Scientometrics, 115, 415-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2644-7
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th ed.). Pearson.
Maddens, L., Depaepe, F., Janssen, R., Raes, A., & Elen, J. (2019, August 12-16). Evaluating the Leuven research skills test [Poster session]. 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/642425
Maddens, L., Depaepe, F., Janssen, R., Raes, A., & Elen, J. (2020). Evaluating the Leuven research skills test for 11th and 12th grade. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918825040
Maddens, L., Depaepe, F., Janssen, R., Raes, A., & Elen, J. (2021). Research skills in upper secondary education and in first year of university. Educational Studies, 47(4), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1715204
National Science Board- National Science Foundation. (2024). Science and Engineering Indicators: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20243
Ndiango, S., Kumburu, N. P., & Jaffu, R. (2023). Research self-efficacy and research productivity: evidence from academics in Tanzanian public higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 510-522. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0308
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaf, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22(4), 628-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000094224008
Randazzo, M., Priefer, R., & Pasupathy, R. (2021). Research self-efficacy and productivity in communication sciences and disorders faculty. Journal of Communication Disorders, 92, Article 106107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106107
Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Wiley.
Ruiz-Castillo, J., & Costas, R. (2014). The skewness of scientific productivity. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 917-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.006
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 8, Article 1268045. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045
Stupnisky, R. H., BrckaLorenz, A., & Laird, T. F. N. (2019). How does faculty research motivation type relate to success? A test of self-determination theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.007
Stupnisky, R. H., Hall, N. C., Daniels, L. M., & Mensah, E. (2017). Testing a model of pretenure faculty members’ teaching and research success: Motivation as a mediator of balance, expectations, and collegiality. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 376-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272317
Stupnisky, R. H., Larivière, V., Hall, N. C., & Omojiba, O. (2023). Predicting research productivity in stem faculty: The role of self-determined motivation. Research in Higher Education, 64, 598-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09718-3
*Tahsildar, N., & Hasani, R. (2021). Faculty-perceived research skills and research productivity: A case study at a public university in Afghanistan. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 14(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v14i3.2065
*Ulrich, W., & Dash, D. P. (2013). Research skills for the future: Summary and critique of a comparative study in eight countries. Journal of Research Practice, 9(1), 1-25. https://bit.ly/4hL4OV6
Verburgh, A., Elen, J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). Investigating the myth of the relationship between teaching and research in higher education: A review of empirical research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26, 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9055-1
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. https://bit.ly/3WTw77W
Widihastrini, F., Trimurtini, Susilaningsih, S., & Bektiningsih, K. (2020). Measuring undergraduate elementary school teacher candidates' research skills. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2020). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453749
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(3), 407-415. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971