Abad, E., Gil, J., & Suárez, P. (2017). A game-based educational method relying on student-generated questions. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33 (6A), 1786–1797. https://bit.ly/3lo9toz

Almuntasheri, S. (2016). Saudi teachers’ practices of formative assessment: A qualitative study. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 74, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/16.74.06

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1983). Psicología educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo [Educational psychology: A cognitive view]. Trillas. https://bit.ly/3LqgLCU

Bahati, B., Fors, U., & Hansen, P. (2017, October). Using student-generated questions and peer-responses as a formative e-assessment strategy: Students acting as more knowledgeable others. In J. Dron & S. Mishra (Eds.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 108-117). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181303

Banks, D. (2008). The development of scientific writing. Linguistic features and historical context. Equinox.

Bates, S. P., Galloway, R. K., Riise, J., & Homer, D. (2014). Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), Article 020105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020105

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022

Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802373841

Black, P. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. McGraw-Hill Education.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky´s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39 – 64). Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095249

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question‐posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411-430. https://doi.org/dwf38w

Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: Understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00920.x

Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187

Foos, P. W. (1989). Effects of student-written questions on student test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 16(2), 77-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1602_10

Furió-Mas, C., & Aranzabal, J. G. (2001). La enseñanza del concepto de campo eléctrico basada en un modelo de aprendizaje como investigación orientada [The teaching of the electric field concept based on a learning model as research oriented]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 19(2), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4007

Gil, J., Pérez, A. L., Suero, M. I., Macías, F. S., & Fernández, P. J. P. (2010). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a method of active learning based on Reigeluth and Stein’s Elaboration Theory. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 628-641.

Hancock, D., Hare, N., Denny, P., & Denyer, G. (2018). Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(4), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21119

Horgen, S. A. (2007). Pedagogical use of multiple choice tests—students create their own tests. In P. Kefalas, A. Sotiriadou, G. Davies, & A. McGettrick (Eds.), Proceedings of the Informatics Education Europe II Conference (pp. 386-392). SEERC. https://bit.ly/3lqrjY8

Hsu, C. -C., & Wang, T. -I. (2018). Applying game mechanics and student-generated questions to an online puzzle-based game learning system to promote algorithmic thinking skills. Computers & Education, 121, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.002  

Hutchinson, D., & Wells, J. (2013). An inquiry into the effectiveness of student generated MCQs as a method of assessment to improve teaching and learning. Creative Education, 4(7), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A2014

Kemmis, S. (2001). Critical theory for participatory action research. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 121-138). Sage.

Koch, A., & Eckstein, S. G. (1991). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students’ question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130410

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Llancaqueo Henríquez, A., Caballero Sahelices, M. C., & Moreira, M. A. (2003). El concepto de campo en el aprendizaje de la Física y en la investigación en educación en ciencias [The concept of field in the learning of Physics and in research in science education]. Revista electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 2(3), 227-253. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/94804

Márquez, L. M. T., Llinás, J. G., & Macías, F. S. (2017). Collaborative learning: Use of the jigsaw technique in mapping concepts of physics. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(1), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/17.75.92

Maskill, R., & de Jesus, H. P. (1997). Pupils’ questions, alternative frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 781-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190704

Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50-51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168927

Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. (2003). La integración del sistema universitario español en el Espacio Europeo de Enseñanza Superior [The integration of the Spanish university system in the European Higher Education Area]. https://bit.ly/3YU9Ip1

Muñoz-García, M. A., Moreda, G. P., Hernández-Sánchez, N., & Valiño, V. (2013). Student reciprocal peer teaching as a method for active learning: An experience in an electrotechnical laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 729-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9426-4

Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., Alconchel, F., & Pinto, G. (2012). Metodologías activas para el aprendizaje de la física: Un caso de hidrostática para su introducción en la práctica docente [Active methodologies for learning physics: A case of hydrostatics for introduction into teaching practice]. Revista Española de Física, 26(1), 45-50.

Olsher, G., & Dreyfus, A. (1999). Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing junior high-school students' ability to ask meaningful questions about abstract biological processes. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290750

Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3-4), 237-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2006.9652991

Sanchez-Elez, M., Pardines, I., Garcia, P., Miñana, G., Roman, S., Sanchez, M., & Risco, J. L. (2014). Enhancing students’ learning process through self-generated tests. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9447-7

Tanel, Z., & Erol, M. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on instructing magnetism: Analysis of an experimental teaching sequence. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(2), 124-136.

Teplitski, M., Irani, T., Krediet, C. J., Di Cesare, M., & Marvasi, M. (2018). Student-generated pre-exam questions is an effective tool for participatory learning: A case study from ecology of waterborne pathogens course. Journal of Food Science Education, 17(3), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12129

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4

Watts, M., & Alsop, S. (1995). Questioning and conceptual understanding: The quality of pupils' questions in science. School Science Review, 76(277), 91-95.

Watts, M., Alsop, S., Gould, G., & Walsh, A. (1997). Prompting teachers’ constructive reflection: Pupils’ questions as critical incidents. International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1025-1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190903

Watts, M., Gould, G., & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: Categorising pupils' questions in science. School Science Review, 79(286), 57-63.

Wu, C. -P., Chen, Y. -C., & Wu, S. -L. (2018, January). Development of a collaborative learning space for student generated-question strategy. In M. Krishnamurthi & M. Iinuma (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (pp. 102-105). https://doi.org/10.1145/3178158.3178177

Yu, F. -Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.002

Yu, F. -Y., & Chen, Y. -J. (2014). Effects of student‐generated questions as the source of online drill‐and‐practice activities on learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 316-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12036

Yu, F. -Y., & Wu, W. -S. (2020). Effects of student-generated feedback corresponding to answers to online student-generated questions on learning: What, why, and how? Computers & Education, 145, Article 103723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103723