Developing Competency Evaluation of Pre-service Science Teachers in Industrial Revolution 4.0: Revealing Pedagogic and Professional Competencies
Endang Susantini
,
Badrun Kartowagiran
,
Syukrul Hamdi
,
Samsul Hadi
,
Amat Jaedun
,
I Gede Astra Wesnawa
,
Dadang Sunendar
,
Lukman Abdul Rauf Laliyo
This study aimed to develop an instrument to assess science teacher candidates’ professional and pedagogical competence in the Industrial revolu.
- Pub. date: May 15, 2022
- Pages: 347-362
- 354 Downloads
- 469 Views
- 2 Citations
This study aimed to develop an instrument to assess science teacher candidates’ professional and pedagogical competence in the Industrial revolution 4.0. The instrument consisted of 30 questions and was used in the main study, which was analyzed using the Rasch model to unravel the reliability and empirical validity. The questions were developed based on a predetermined grid including the skills and literacy aspects used in the industrial revolution 4.0. The 30 revised questions were then tested on 60 students of Science Education at two State universities in Indonesia who were in their third year of study times. The Rasch model was employed to test its reliability and empirical validity that included Wright map analysis, item difficulty level, distractor analysis, and item suitability with the Rasch model. The results showed that the reliability value of the professional aspect was .95 and classified as an excellent category. Moreover, the pedagogic aspect obtained .93 and was classified as a very good category. Only one question was the most difficult and did not fit the Rasch model, while the others already fitted. This reliable and valid instrument is suggested to be useful in assessing pre-service science teachers’ competence.
Keywords: Industrial revolution, Rasch model, teacher competence, test development.
References
Abdullah, Q. A., Humaidi, N., & Shahrom, M. (2020). Industry revolution 4.0: The readiness of graduates of higher education institutions for fulfilling job demands. Romanian Journal of Information Technology and Automatic Control, 30(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.1055
Akimova, L., Akimov, O., Mihus, I., Koval, Y., & Dmitrenko, V. (2020). Improvement of the methodological approach to assessing the impact of public governance on ensuring the economic security of the state. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(35), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.221969
Alda, R., Boholano, H., & Dayagbil, F. (2020). Teacher education institutions in the Philippines towards education 4.0. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.8
Amalia, A. N., & Widayati, A. (2012). Analisis butir soal tes kendali mutu kelas XII SMA mata pelajaran ekonomi akuntansi di Kota Yogyakarta tahun 2012 [Analysis of quality control test items for class XII SMA economics accounting subject in Yogyakarta City in 2012]. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 10(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v10i1.919
Applegate, G. M., Sutherland, K. A., Becker, K. A., & Luo, X. (2019). The effect of option homogeneity in multiple-choice items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618770803
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran [Learning evaluatio]. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bakar, N. S. A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher's self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259-276. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276.
Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i1.657
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Gierl, M. J., Bulut, O., Guo, Q., & Zhang, X. (2017). Developing, analyzing, and using distractors for multiple-choice tests in education: A comprehensive review. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1082–1116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317726529
Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
Haladyna, T. M., Rodriguez, M. C., & Stevens, C. (2019). Are multiple-choice items too fat? Applied Measurement in Education, 32(4), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2019.1660348
Indira, E. W. M., Hermanto, A., & Pramono, S. E. (2020, June). Improvement of teacher competence in the industrial revolution era 4.0. In S. Xiao (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019) (pp. 350-352). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.068
Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between scientific attitudes and science process skills toward technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.2020.XX
Kopotun, I. M., Durdynets, M. Y., Teremtsova, N. V., Markina, L. L., & Prisnyakova, L. M. (2020). The use of smart technologies in the professional training of students of the Law Departments for the development of their critical thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.10
Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in higher education: Teacher perspectives on professional development and certification. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12272
Maryanti, N., Rohana, R., & Kristiawan, M. (2020). The principal’s strategy in preparing students ready to face the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Educational Review, 2(1), 54-69. https://bit.ly/3L0rnV7
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model evaluasi program dalam penelitian evaluasi [Program evaluation model in evaluation research]. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas, 3(1). https://bit.ly/39HG02E
Nuryanti, S., Masykuri, M., & Susilowati, E. (2018). Analisis Iteman dan model Rasch pada pengembangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik sekolah menengah kejuruan [Iteman's analysis and Rasch's model on the development of critical thinking skills of vocational high school students]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21442
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Philbeck, T. D. (2017). Can we build a resilient employment market for an uncertain future? In LaGrandeur, K., Hughes, J. Surviving the Machine Age (pp. 83-106). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51165-8_6
Rahiem, M. D. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1
Türkoguz, S. (2020). Investigation of three-tier diagnostic and multiple choice tests on chemistry concepts with response change behaviour. International Education Studies, 13(9), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n9p10
Wahyuni, D. (2018). Peningkatan kompetensi guru menuju era revolusi industri 4.0 [Improving teacher competence towards the industrial revolution era 4.0]. Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis Puslit Badan Keahlian DPR RI, X (24), 13-18. https://bit.ly/3FyrZAk
Wartoni, W., & Benyamin, P. I. (2020). Strategi pengembangan tes objektif (pilihan ganda) [Objective test development strategy (multiple choice)]. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 5(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.46933/DGS.vol5i1%25p
World Economic Forum. (2016, January 1). The future of jobs. https://bit.ly/3FBIyvl
Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90
Yurdakul, I. K. (2011). An evaluative case study on professional competency of preservice information technology teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 33-53. https://bit.ly/39TIYkS