Exploring Teachers' Views on Code-Switching as a Communicative Technique to Enhance the Teaching of Mathematics in Grade 4
The teaching and learning of mathematics in South Africa are conducted through the authorised Language of Learning and Teaching (LoLT). South Africa h.
- Pub. date: November 15, 2021
- Pages: 637-648
- 347 Downloads
- 597 Views
- 3 Citations
The teaching and learning of mathematics in South Africa are conducted through the authorised Language of Learning and Teaching (LoLT). South Africa has eleven official languages, and English is a Language of Learning and Teaching (LoLT) from the Intermediate and Further Education and Training (FET) Phase. This study explores teachers' views on code-switching as a communicative technique to enhance teaching mathematics in Grade 4 in selected primary schools in South Africa. This qualitative single case study employed the interpretivist paradigm and social constructivism theory. A convenient purposive sampling technique was used to sample six grade 4 mathematics teachers from three primary schools in the Alexandra township in South Africa. Researchers collected data through the use of semi-structured interviews, which were later analysed and discussed using themes. Findings indicate that teachers often code-switch from LoLT (English First Additional Language) into Home Language (H.L.) to enhance learners' understanding of the mathematics concepts. Researchers suggested the integration of code-switching into the curriculum policy and followed by in-service training for Grade 4 mathematics teachers in code-switching.
Keywords: Code-switching, communicative teaching technique, mathematics, primary schools, teaching and learning.
References
Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p73
Bailey, A. A. (2011). Codeswitching in the foreign language classroom: students' attitudes and perceptions and the factors impacting them [Master’s thesis, University of Toledo] University of Toledo Archive. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view
Barker, C. (1993). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Bature, I. J., & Atweh, B. (2019). Collaboration: A collective bargain for achieving quality mathematics classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.347
Bay, E., Bagceci, B., & Cetin, B. (2012). The Effects of Social Constructivist Approach on the Learners’ Problem Solving and Metacognitive Levels. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 343-349. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2012.343.349
Benson, C. (2002). Real and potential benefits of bilingual programmes in developing countries. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 5(6), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667764
Cekiso, M., Meyiwa, T., & Mashige, M. (2019). Foundation phase teachers’ experiences with instruction in the mother tongue in the Eastern Cape. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 9(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v9i1.658
Chitera, N. (2009). Code-switching in a college mathematics classroom. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(4), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903184850
Cook, V. (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773
de Sanchez, G. A., Gabriel, M. A., Anderson, A., & Turnbull, M. (2018). Code-Switching Explorations in Teaching Early Number Sense. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010038
Department of Basic Education. (2012). Report on the annual national assessments 2012. Government Printing Works. https://bit.ly/3BxSKlC
Department of Basic Education. (2013). Report on the annual national assessments 2013. Government Printing Works. https://bit.ly/3AxtE55
Department of Basic Education. (2014). Report on the annual national assessments 2014. Government Printing Works. https://bit.ly/3oQPcqV
Flick, U. 2013. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
Foley, A. (2010). Mother tongue education in South Africa. Teaching English Today. https://bit.ly/3GEnKDg
Gobbo, F., O’Suullivan, D., & Longo, L. (2018). An investigation of the impact of a social constructivist teaching approach, based on trigger questions, through measures of mental workload and efficiency. In B. McLaren, R. Reilly, S. Zvacek & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2018) (pp. 292-302). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006790702920302
Gutstein, E. (2007). “And that’s just how it starts”: Teaching mathematics and developing students’ agency. Teachers College Record, 109, 420-448. https://bit.ly/3lw9NPf
Horasan, S. (2014). Code-switching in EFL classrooms and the perceptions of the students and teachers. Journal of language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 31-45. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/159.
Jantjies, M., & Joy, M. (2016). Lessons learnt from teachers' perspectives on mobile learning in South Africa with cultural and linguistic constraints. South African Journal of Education, 36(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n3a1274
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 317-334). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833
Liu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2014). The application of constructivism to the teaching of intercultural communication. English Language Teaching, 7(5), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n5p136
Long, C., & Dunne, T. (2014). Approaches to teaching primary level mathematics. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(2), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v4i2.208
Mabule, D. R. (2015). What is this? Is it code-switching, code-mixing, or language alternating? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1p339
Mahlambi, S. B., & Mawela, A. S. (2021). Exploring Grade 6 mathematics teachers’ use of the language of learning and teaching in assessment for learning. Journal of Education, 82, 129-148. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i82a08
Maluleke, M. (2019). Using code-switching as an empowerment strategy in teaching mathematics to learners with limited proficiency in English in South African schools. South African Journal of education, 39(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n3a1528
Masna, Y. (2020). EFL learners‟ code-switching: Why do they switch the language? Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 8(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v8i1.6662
McMillan, J. H. (2016). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (7th ed.). Pearson
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed). Pearson.
Metila, R. A. (2009). Decoding the Switch: The functions of code-switching in the classroom. Education Quarterly, 67(1), 44-61. http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/edq/article/view/2018
Modupeola, O. R. (2013). Code-switching as a teaching strategy: Implication for English Language teaching and learning in a multilingual society. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 14(3), 92–94. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-1439294
Mooko, T. (2004). An investigation into the use of Setswana to teach primary mathematics. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310408666692
Moono, H., & Rankin, N. (2013). Education and Employment in Zambia. International Growth Centre. https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Moono-Rankin-2013-Working-Paper.pdf
Moschkovich, J. (2005). Using two languages when learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9005-1
Mukti, T. P., & Muljani, R. (2016). Code-switching in the instructions of English language education study program lecturers. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language teaching, 19(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2016.190105
Musharrat, T. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions about use and challenges of hands-on activities in secondary science classroom. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(12), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i12.3384
Nishanthi, R. (2020). Understanding of the importance of mother tongue learning. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 5(1), 77-88. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd35846.pdf
Ofaletse, K., & Oats, R. (2019). Code switching at reception classes in Botswana: a strategy to academic excellence. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 9(12), 746-757. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.12.2019.p969
Okwueme, C. O., Ekon, E. E., & Ezenwa-Nebife, D. O. (2015). The impact of hands-on-approach on student academic performance in basic science and mathematics. Higher Education Studies, 5(6), 47-51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086006.pdf
Olmo-castillo, W. N. (2014). Teachers' attitudes towards code-switching within a bilingual classroom. [Master’s thesis, State University of New York College] State University of New York College Archive. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/5582
Pandor, N. (2006, October 5). Language issues and challenges [Paper presentation]. The Language Policy Implementation in HEIs Conference, Pretoria, South Africa.
Setati, M. (1998, January 14-17). Language Practices in mathematics Classrooms: Focus on Codeswitching, Chanting and Chorusing [Paper presentation]. The 6th Annual meeting of The Southern African Association for Research in mathematics and Science Education, University of South Africa, South Africa.
Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching-learning in the classroom. International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749-752. https://bit.ly/3GMRjm9
Shartiely, N. E. (2016). Code-switching in university classroom interaction: A case study of the University of Dar es Salaam. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 49, 215-231. https://doi.org/10.5842/49-0-663
Sikhondze, G. E., & Goosen, L. (2010). Teachers’ views on code switching in grade 4 mathematics classroom. Institute for Science and Technology Education, (2010), 342-354.
Simasiku, L., Kasanda, C., & Smit, T. (2015). Can code switching enhance learners’ academic achievement? English Language Teaching, 8(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n2p70
Suganda, L. A., Loeneto, B. A., & Zuraida. (2018). Teachers’ use of code switching in an English as a foreign language context in Indonesia. Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 3(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v3i2.202
Taylor, N., van der Berg, S., & Mabogoane, T. (2012). What makes schools effective? Report of South Africa’s national school effectiveness study. Pearson Education
Trisnawati, I. K. (2017). Maintaining the identity of bilingual individuals in multicultural/multilingual settings. Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 5(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v5i1.1660
Venkat, H., & Spaull, N. (2015). What do we know about primary teachers’ mathematical content knowledge in South Africa? An analysis of SACMEQ 2007. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 121-130. https://.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.02.002
Vergnaud, G. (1988). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. The journal of Mathematics Behavior, 17(2), 167 – 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80057-3
Yusob, K. F., Abd Nassir, A., & Tarmuji, N. H. (2018). Code-switching in mathematics classroom: Relationship between students’ attention and attitude and their learning success. LSP International Journal, 5(10), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.11113/Ispi.v5n1.64