Socio-formative Pedagogical Counseling: Professionalization and Improvement of Teaching Practice in Compulsory Education in Northern Mexico
Haydeé Parra Acosta
,
Perla Briselda Cordero Lerma
,
José López Loya
Technical and pedagogical counseling as accompaniment benefits teachers’ development. However, there are information gaps on the specific impact.
- Pub. date: February 15, 2022
- Pages: 1-9
- 416 Downloads
- 726 Views
- 0 Citations
Technical and pedagogical counseling as accompaniment benefits teachers’ development. However, there are information gaps on the specific impact of counseling with a socio-formative approach on both professionalization and the improvement of teaching practice. The objective is to analyze the relationship between these three elements. A cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was employed. A validated questionnaire was applied to a representative sample of 212 teachers. The information analysis was carried out through statistics: descriptive, correlational, and linear regression, whose level of significance was: <.01-. 05. Teachers consider that technical and pedagogical counseling from socio-formation fosters the development of an ethical life project, promotes problem solving in their educational practice, collaborative work, metacognition, and entrepreneurship (92.78 ± 14.3). The correlational analysis showed a significant relationship between socio-formative pedagogical technical counseling and teaching practice, the latter of which was enhanced by the former. In the linear regression analysis, the best model of pedagogical technical counseling is made from socio-formation, which predicts a 71% improvement of teaching practice. As a result, this form of counseling benefits both professionalization and teaching practice through metacognition.
Keywords: Technical and pedagogical, accompaniment, problem solving, metacognition, ethical life project.
References
Agreda, A. -A., & Pérez, M. -Á. (2020). Relación entre acompañamiento pedagógico y práctica reflexiva docente [Relationship between pedagogical accompaniment and reflective teaching practice]. Revista de Educación, 2(30), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.37177/UNICEN/EB30-273
Anijovich, R., & Capelletti, G. (2018). La práctica reflexiva en los docentes en servicio. Posibilidades y limitaciones [Reflective practice in in-service teachers. Possibilities and limitations]. Revista de Educación, (28), 74-92. https://bit.ly/3JCIXPK
Ávila, L. -A., Hernández, A. -K., Echeverría, M. -D., & Zambrano, A. (2016). El acompañamiento a docentes de educación básica para niños jornaleros migrantes y desarrollo docente [The accompaniment of basic education teachers for migrant day laborers and teacher development]. Innovación Educativa, 16(71), 111-130. https://bit.ly/3EPwVP6
Berebitsky, D., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2017). Teacher advice-seeking: Relating centrality and expertise in middle school mathematics social networks. Teacher College Record, 119 (10), 1-40. https://bit.ly/3neXoQR
Bressman, S., & Winter, J. (2018). Next generation mentoring: supporting teachers beyond induction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 73, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.003
Cantillo, B., & Calabria, M. (2018). Acompañamiento pedagógico: Estrategia para la práctica reflexiva en los docentes de tercer grado de básica primaria [Pedagogical accompaniment: strategy for reflexive practice in primary basic third-grade teachers]. [Tesis de maestría inédita]. Facultad de Humanidades. Universidad de la Costa CUC. Barranquilla. https://bit.ly/3Eq4LdA
Carpenter, J., Trust, T., Kimmons, R., & Krutka, D. (2021). Sharing and self-promoting: An analysis of educator tweeting at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100038
Carrera, F. -X., Vaquero, E., & Balsells, M. (2011). Instrumento de evaluación de competencias digitales para adolescentes en riesgo social [Instrument for the evaluation of digital skills for adolescents at social risk]. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (35), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2011.35.410
Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Amieiro, N., Valle, A., Rosário, P., & Núñez, J.-C. (2019). El papel mediador de la autosuficiencia y la utilidad entre el conocimiento y el uso de estrategias de autorregulación del aprendizaje [Mediating role of self-efficacy and usefulness between self-regulated learning strategy knowledge and its use]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.08.001
Comisión Europea/EACEA/Eurydice. (2018). La profesión docente en Europa: Acceso, progression y apoyo. Informe de Eurydice [The teaching profession in Europe: Access, progression and support. Eurydice report]. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. https://doi.org/10.2797/917260
Estepa, P. M., & Gallego-Domínguez, C. (2018). Condiciones de desarrollo profesional del técnico docente Dominicano como asesor pedagógico [Conditions for the professional development of the Dominican teaching technician as a pedagogical advisor]. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 16(1), 51-67. https://bit.ly/3qm6Z8E
Ferrá, Á. L. (2018). Modelo de gestión del acompañamiento pedagógico para maestro de primaria [Modeling schoolteachers coaching and supervision as a formative process]. Transformación, 14(1), 44-57. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/trf/v14n1/trf05118.pdf
Freire, P. (1997). Política y educación [Politics and education]. Siglo XXI. https://bit.ly/3mydu7b
Galán, B. (2017). Estrategias de acompañamiento pedagógico para el desarrollo profesional docente [Pedagogical support strategies for teacher professional development]. RECIE Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 1(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2017.v1i1.pp34-52
Garay, M., & Bórquez, C. (2015). La asistencia técnica educativa: ¿Un aporte a la calidad de la gestión escolar? [Educational technical assistance: a contribution to the quality of school management?]. Revista electrónica Diálogos Educativos, 14(28), 41-63. https://bit.ly/3ziBfW9
Imbernón, F. (2017). Ser docente en una sociedad compleja. La difícil tarea de enseñar [Being a teacher in a complex society. The difficult task of teaching]. Graó. https://bit.ly/3k7aQnV
Janssen, N., Knoef, M., & Lazonder, A. (2019). Apoyo tecnológico y pedagógico para la planificación de lecciones de profesores en formación [Technological and pedagogical support for lesson planning for trainee teachers]. Tecnología, Pedagogía y Educación, 28(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554
López, J.-C., & García, T. (2021). Acompañamiento y asesoría técnica pedagógica: desafíos y líneas de actuación en una región de Zacatecas, México [Pedagogical accompaniment and pedagogical technical advice: challenges and lines of action in a region of Zacatecas, México]. Revista de investigación educativa, 3(5), 79-107. https://bit.ly/311UnLq
Murillo, P., & Gallego-Domínguez, C. (2018). Condiciones de desarrollo profesional del técnico docente dominicano como asesor pedagógico [Conditions of professional development of the Dominican teaching technician as pedagogical advisor]. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 16(1), 51-67. https://bit.ly/31jRyFt
Oviedo, H.-C., & Campo, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach [An Approach to the Use of Cronbach's Alpha]. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572‐580. https://bit.ly/31jVBSb
Peña, F. L. M., Peña, F. E. M., & Sánchez, J. D. A. (2017). Formación del docente y su adaptación al Modelo TPACK [Teacher training and its adaptation to the TPACK Model]. Revista Ciencias Pedagógicas e Innovación, 5(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v5i1.154
Polit, D.-F., Cheryl, B., & Steven, O. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Reséndiz, N.-N. (2020). Modelos de asesoría pedagógica y su incidencia en las propuestas de asesoramiento para la educación básica en México [Models of pedagogical coach and their incidence in coaching proposals for basic education in Mexico]. Avances En Supervisión Educativa, (34), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.23824/ase.v0i34.692
Ríos, D., & Villalobos, P. (2016). Mejora educativa a partir de asesoría externa: el complejo camino hacia la sostenibilidad [Educational improvement through external consultancy: The difficult road towards sustainability]. SciElo, 42(2), 315-330. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000200018
Rodríguez-Molina, G. (2017). Liderazgo en las unidades técnicas pedagógicas: sus prácticas e influencia en el trabajo docente [Leadership in the Units of pedagogical techniques: their practices and influence in the teaching work]. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 16(31), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20173169945
Solbes, J., Fernández, J., Domínguez, M.-C., & Cantó, J. (2018). Influencia de la formación y la investigación didáctica del profesorado de ciencias sobre su práctica docente [Influence of teacher training and science education research in the teaching practice of science in-service teachers]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 36(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2355
Tayag, J. R. (2020). Pedagogical support for blended learning classrooms: Interfacing teacher and student perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2536-2541. https://10.13189/ujer.2020.080637
Tejada-Fernández, J., Carvalho-Dias, M.-L., & Ruiz-Bueno, C. (2017). El prácticum en la formación de maestros: percepciones de los protagonistas [Practicum in teacher development education: Participants perceptions]. Magis, Revista Internacional De Investigación En Educación, 9(19), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m9-19.pfmp
Tobón, S., González, L., Nambo, J.-S., & Vázquez, J.-M. (2015). La socioformación: un estudio conceptual [The socioformation: A conceptual research] Paradigma, XXXVI(1), 7-29. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/pdg/v36n1/art02.pdf
Tobón, S., Martínez, J.-E., Valdéz, E., & Quiriz, T. (2018). Prácticas pedagógicas: Análisis mediante la cartografía conceptual [Pedagogical practices: Analysis by conceptual cartography]. Revista Espacios, 39(53), 31. https://bit.ly/31mbuYv
Voras, C. (2021). Universidad Nacional de Rosario: Análisis de la experiencia del acompañamiento pedagógico virtual durante el 2020, en el marco de la pandemia Covid19 [National University of Rosario: Analysis of the experience of virtual pedagogical accompaniment during 2020, in the framework of the Covid19 pandemic]. CUPEA Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina, (133), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.35305/cc.vi133.113
Yana, S. -M., & Adco, V. -H. (2018). Acompañamiento pedagógico y el rol docente en jornada escolar completa: Caso instituciones educativas Santa Rosa y Salesianos de San Juan Bosco-Puno Perú [Pedagogical support and the teaching role in full school day: Case of educational institutions Santa Rosa and Salesianos of San Juan Bosco – Puno Perú]. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandin, 20(1), 137-148. https://bit.ly/3k5CjpK
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
Zabalza, M. -A. (2017). Evaluar en Educación Infantil [Evaluation in Early Childhood Education]. RELADEI. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Infantil, 6(1-2), 9-14.
Zeballos, M. (2020). Acompañamiento Pedagógico Digital para Docentes [Digital pedagogical accompaniment for teachers]. Revista Internacional Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 192-203.
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.164